|
R&D Systems
recombinant human igg1 fc Recombinant Human Igg1 Fc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human igg1 fc/product/R&D Systems Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human igg1 fc - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
biotinylated human ephrin a5 fc chimera Biotinylated Human Ephrin A5 Fc Chimera, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated human ephrin a5 fc chimera/product/R&D Systems Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated human ephrin a5 fc chimera - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
91/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
human ephrin a5 fc ![]() Human Ephrin A5 Fc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/human ephrin a5 fc/product/R&D Systems Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human ephrin a5 fc - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
ephrina5 fc ![]() Ephrina5 Fc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/ephrina5 fc/product/R&D Systems Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ephrina5 fc - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Fisher Scientific
recombinant human ephrin-a5 fc chimera protein (fisher scientific) ![]() Recombinant Human Ephrin A5 Fc Chimera Protein (Fisher Scientific), supplied by Fisher Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human ephrin-a5 fc chimera protein (fisher scientific)/product/Fisher Scientific Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human ephrin-a5 fc chimera protein (fisher scientific) - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: The topographic projection in the chicken visual system connects RGCs from the retina to the midbrain's optic tectum. The temporal/nasal (t/n) axis of the retina is mapped onto the anterior/posterior (a/p) axis of the tectum, whereas the retinal dorsal/ventral axis projects onto the lateral/medial axis of the tectum. Retinal GCs are guided to their tectal targets by repulsive signals from counter-gradient distributions of tectal ephrin-As (red; p>a) and EphAs (blue; a>p). Detection of these cues is mediated via retinal EphA and ephrin-A sensors, which are expressed in t>n and n>t gradients, respectively. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.003
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques:
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Temporal GCs initially collapse upon application of 250 ng/ml ephrin-A5-Fc (eA5 20 min: 77.1%), but recover their morphology within 120 min in the presence of the cue (eA5 120 min: 32.9% collapsed GCs). Ephrin-A5-Fc is still functional after incubation for 120 min, when re-used on a fresh culture (eA5 recycled 20 min: 81.5% collapsed). Fc controls demonstrate the specificity of the effect of ephrin-A5 (Fc 20 min: 23.3%; Fc recycled 20 min: 20.7%; Fc 120 min: 27.2%). ( B ) Representative intact and collapsed GC morphology (Phalloidin Alexa488). Scale bar: 10 µm. ( C ) Soluble EphA3-Fc triggers a collapse when administered at 15 µg/ml (EA3 20 min: 64.4% collapsed), whereas an equimolar concentration of Fc (4.2 µg/ml) does not (Fc 20 min: 24.3%). GCs desensitize towards EphA3-Fc within 120 min (EA3 120 min: 22.6%). Combined data from nasal and temporal GCs. N: number of independent experiments; number of analyzed GCs in brackets. Error bars represent standard deviations. T-test with n.s.: α ≥0.05, ***: α <0.001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.004 10.7554/eLife.25533.005 Figure 2—source data 1. Original data underlying bar charts of . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.005
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques: Functional Assay, Incubation, Concentration Assay
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Moderate concentrations of EphA3-Fc (EA3) do not trigger a collapse of nasal or temporal GCs, neither in dimeric nor in an antibody clustered form (Fc, 1 µg/ml, 20 min: 16.1% collapsed; EA3, 2 µg/ml, 5 min: 15.3%; 10 min: 17.3%; 30 min: 22.4%; EA3, 5 µg/ml antibody-clustered (C), 20 min: 21.7% collapsed). Antibody-induced clustering was achieved by preincubation of EphA3 with anti human Alexa Fluor488 goat IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a molar ratio of 2:1 (EphA3:AB) for 1 hr at room temperature. N: number of independent experiments; number of analyzed GCs in brackets. Error bars represent standard deviations. ( B ) Concentration-dependent binding of ephrin-A5 to EphA3 (see Materials and methods for details). Dissociation constants (K D ) of ephrin-A5 and EphA3 decrease abruptly with increasing EphA3 concentrations, indicating a sharp increase in binding affinity, which is potentially due to the concentration-dependent formation of EphA3 clusters in solution. K D s ephrin-A5 binding to: EphA3 3 µg/ml: 36.68 nM; EphA3 15 µg/ml: 0.76 nM; EphA3 33 µg/ml: 1.23 nM; EphA3 100 µg/ml: 0.55 nM. ( C ) Potential EphA3 clusters are stable for at least one day in solution at a concentration of 11 µg/ml as indicated by a constant K D (fresh EphA3, 11 µg/ml: 3.37 nM; 1 day old EphA3, 11 µg/ml: 3.40 nM). ( B, C ) N: number of independent experiments. Error bars represent standard deviations. T-test with n.s.: α ≥0.05; *: α <0.05. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.006 10.7554/eLife.25533.007 Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data underlying bar charts of . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.007
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques: Concentration Assay, Binding Assay
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: Subfigures in ( A ) and ( B ) each display a cartoon (left) illustrating the experimental setup consisting of explant (thick black strip), axons and printed guidance protein (colored field(s)), the inverted signal of fluorescent phalloidin-stained axonal actin (middle; explant not shown) and the underlying, antibody-labeled substrate (right) are shown in a detailed view of a representative microscopic image (scale: 100 µm). ( A ) Naïve temporal axons stop in front of a homogeneous field of ephrin-A5-Fc (eA5 15 µg/ml; red), but do not react to an identical boundary when initially grown on ephrin-A5 after a 65 µm wide gap ( A' ). Stopping behavior returns in axons having crossed a 215 µm wide, ephrin-free gap ( A'' ). ( B–B'' ) Nasal RGC axons show very similar behavior on EphA3-Fc (EA3 15 µg/ml, blue) gap substrates as described for ephrin-A5 gap assays. ( C ) Quantification of gap assays. Stop reactions were quantified as the percentage of fibers not entering the protein field after the gap. Fc naïve: 28.8% stopping. eA5 naïve: 98.0%, eA5 50 µm: 15.3%, eA5 75 µm: 43.0%, eA5 100 µm: 59.2%, eA5 200 µm: 81.0% stopping. EA3 naïve: 92.6%, EA3 65 µm: 25.0%, EA3 90 µm: 39.9%, EA3 115 µm: 60.1%, EA3 215 µm: 75.8% stopping. Ephrin-A5 gap assay patterns differ slightly from EphA3 patterns in gap width as a result of a modified stamp geometry. N: number of independent experiments. Error bars represent standard deviations. T-test with *: α <0.05, **: α <0.01, ***: α <0.001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.008 10.7554/eLife.25533.009 Figure 3—source data 1. Original data underlying bar chart of . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.009
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques: Stripping Membranes, Staining, Labeling, GAP Assay, Modification
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Fiber terminals are modeled as circular discs bearing Gaussian-shaped distributions of EphAs ( R F , blue) and ephrin-As ( L F , red), according to their retinal origin, moving on a rectangular target field of unit squares ( x T , y T ), carrying target-derived guidance cues ( L T and R T ). Fiber–target and fiber–fiber ( cis and trans ) interactions and the resulting forward and reverse signals integrate into a guidance potential, D , which determines the probability, p , of a change in position (only fiber–target interactions are illustrated in the inset). Additionally, D is used to calculate an adaptation coefficient, a , which simultaneously modulates R F and L F (collectively called S ; ) through 'co-adaptation'. A resetting force, f , counteracts a . For mathematical detail see 'Material and methods'. ( B ) Mapping plots of simulations with 200 fiber terminals using different implementations of adaptation. The anterior-posterior (a-p) position of a terminal on the target is plotted as a function of naso-temporal (n-t) origin (perfect topography is indicated by all terminals targeting the main diagonal). Terminals that are enabled to regulate sensors independently from each other by canonical adaptation are widely scattered across the target field (white circles), whereas co-adapted terminals (regulating both sensors concomitantly) find their topographically correct target positions (gray circles). In the basic model, the potential minimum is at a position where fiber and target ephrin/Eph concentrations match. Therefore, canonical adaptation was implemented in terms of a tendency for GCs to independently match their forward and reverse sensor levels to the receptor and ligand levels, respectively, on the current target position. ( C ) After implementation of co-adaptation, naïve terminals stop in front of a field of high ephrin-A or EphA ( L T = 4, red; R T = 4, blue), respectively, but ignore the same boundary in simulated gap assays with small gap size. In simulations with wider gaps, terminals stop again in front of the second field. Gap size = 20, 40, or 100 units respectively; n = 12; i = 2000; target field: 200 × 8. ( D ) Co-adaptation predicts that ephrin-A adapted terminals will ignore a field of high EphA after a small gap and vice versa . Gap size = 20; other parameters as in ( C ). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.010
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques: Derivative Assay
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A–C ) Naïve axons stop in front of a homogeneous field of EphA3-Fc ( A ; EA3, blue; nasal axons), ephrin-A5-Fc ( B ; eA5, red; temporal axons), or Sema3A-Fc ( C ; S3A, green; temporal axons). Scale: 100 μm. ( A'–C' ) Nasal, eA5-adapted GCs ignore a field of EA3 after a small gap ( A' ) and, vice versa , temporal, EA3-adapted GCs ignore eA5 ( B' ). By contrast, temporal, eA5-adapted GCs are still strongly repelled by a field of S3A after a small gap, indicating specific co-adaptation of ephrin-A and EphA signals ( C' ). ( D ) Quantification of combined data of assays with 65 μm and 90 μm wide gaps grouped in ' < 100 μm' bars; 115 μm and 215 μm grouped in ' > 100 μm' bars. eA5-EA3: naïve: 93.4%, <100μm: 26.9%, >100μm: 76.3% stopping. EA3-eA5: naïve: 91.6%, <100μm: 40.3%, >100μm: 77.1% stopping. eA5-S3A: naïve: 93.7%, <100μm: 81.9% stopping. N: number of independent experiments; error bars indicate standard deviations. T-test with n.s.: α ≥0.05, ***: α <0.001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.012 10.7554/eLife.25533.013 Figure 5—source data 1. Original data underlying bar chart of . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.013
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques:
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Naïve axons stop in front of a homogeneous field of Sema3A-Fc (S3A, green), but predominantly ignore a similar field in gap assays with( B ) 65 µm, ( C ) 115 µm and ( D ) 215 µm wide gaps. Axons strongly de-fasciculate and begin to branch in the Sema3A-free areas of the gap substrates, but not when growing on the protein fields (detail shown in C' , white dotted lines indicate the position of the gap). The reason for this notable effect is currently unknown. Remarkably, the desensitization towards Sema3A in these assays is so strong that re-sensitization is not reached even after the largest gap-size available with our contact-printing stamps (215 µm). ( E ) S3A-eA5 double-cue gap assay. Sema3A-adapted GCs do not co-adapt towards ephrin-A5 and stop in front of an ephrin-A5 field after a 65 µm wide gap (cf. ). ( F ) SNAP-ephrin-A5 surface localization on Sema3A-adapted GCs. ( G, G' ) Representative images of SNAP-ephrin-A5 surface-stained GCs growing on laminin or Sema3A, respectively (outline drawn in the actin channel indicated as a white, dotted line). ( H ) Quantification of SNAP-ephrin-A5 surface staining expressed as fold change in relative intensity compared to controls on laminin (on La: 1; on S3A: 1.07). N: number of independent experiments, number of analyzed GCs in brackets; error bars show standard deviations. T-test with n.s.: α ≥ 0.05. Scale ( A–E ): 100 µm, ( G, G' ): 10 µm. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.014 10.7554/eLife.25533.015 Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data underlying bar chart of . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.015
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques: GAP Assay, Staining
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: The FP is EGFP in pSNAP–ephrin-A5–IRES-EGFP and dTomato in pSNAP–ephrin-A5–IRES–dTom. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.018
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques:
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) SNAP–ephrin-A5 surface signal is strongly reduced on GCs growing on either homogeneous EphA3-Fc ( A' ) or ephrin-A5-Fc ( A'' ) compared to controls (on Fc), indicating clearance of sensors from the surface upon co-adaptation. Outlines of GCs drawn in the GFP (transfection marker) channel are indicated as white, dotted lines. Scale: 10 µm. ( A''' ) displays a cartoon of the experiment in ( A–A'' ) with axonal SNAP surface labeled ephrin-A5 in magenta and with the corresponding guidance cues (Fc, gray; EA3, blue and eA5, red). ( B ) Quantification of SNAP–ephrin-A5 surface signal intensities. Relative signal intensity within the GC outline normalized to the control situation is given as fold change (on Fc: 1; on EA3: 0.29; on eA5: 0.32). ( C ) Effects of Pitstop2 on adaptation towards soluble ephrin-A5. Pitstop2 (P; carrier DMSO) prevents temporal GCs from desensitizing to 0.25 µg/ml ephrin-A5-Fc (eA5+DMSO 120 min: 15.8% collapsed; eA5+P 120 min: 74.3% collapsed). The initial response of GCs towards eA5 is unaltered in the presence of P (eA5+DMSO 20 min: 85.4% collapsed; eA5+P: 83.1% collapsed). Neither P itself, nor its carrier DMSO induces a collapse (Fc+DMSO 20 min: 13.6% collapsed; Fc+P 20 min: 7.5% collapsed). ( D ) Effects of Pitstop2 on adaptation towards soluble EphA3. Soluble EphA3-Fc (EA3; 15 µg/ml) triggers a collapse on nasal or temporal GCs (EA3 20 min: 64.4% collapsed; Fc [4.2 µg/ml] 20 min: 24.3% collapsed). GCs desensitize towards EA3 within 120 min (EA3 120 min: 22.6% collapsed), but not in the presence of 30 μM Pitstop2 (EA3+P 120 min: 49.8% collapsed). P does not impede GCs from recovering their morphology in general (EA3 20 min, then Fc+P 120 min: 19.3% collapsed). Combined data from nasal and temporal GCs. ( B, C, D ) N: number of independent experiments, number of analyzed GCs in brackets; error bars represent standard deviations. T-test with n.s.: α ≥0.05, *: α <0.05, ***: α <0.001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.016 10.7554/eLife.25533.017 Figure 6—source data 1. Original data underlying the bar charts of . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.017
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques: Transfection, Marker, Labeling
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Exemplary trajectories of five GCs (combined from N = 3 independent experiments) on ephrin-A5 gap patterns (red) in the presence of 40 µM AIM. Positions of GCs (black dots) were marked at the indicated time points (in minutes) after the addition of AIM. GCs stop and pause (I, III) or stop and retract (II, IV, V) upon reaching the second ephrin field, indicating full re-sensitization despite inhibition of local translation. ( B–B'' ) SNAP–ephrin-A5 dynamics upon GC re-sensitization. Representative images of GCs, stained for formerly intracellular SNAP–ephrin-A5 that has been relocated to the membrane. Outlines of GCs drawn in the actin channel are indicated as white, dotted lines. Surface localization of ephrin-A5 (anti-fluorescein signal) is elevated in re-sensitizing GCs ( B'' , off ephrin-A5) compared to desensitized GCs ( B' , on ephrin-A5). Scale: 10 μm. ( C ) Experimental setup with retinal explant (black) on a field of ephrin-A5 (red) and cartoon of the experiment shown in ( B–B'' ) with intracellular SNAP–ephrin-A5 (green), which is detected on the surface (magenta star). ( D ) Quantification of membrane-relocated SNAP–ephrin-A5 signals. Relative anti-fluorescein signal intensity within the GC outline normalized to the control is given as fold change. Control — 1; on eA5 — 0.85; off eA5 — 1.13. N: number of independent experiments, number of analyzed GCs in brackets; error bars represent standard deviations. T-test with n.s.: α ≥0.05, *: α <0.05. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.019 10.7554/eLife.25533.020 Figure 7—source data 1. Original data underlying the bar chart in . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.020
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques: Inhibition, Staining, Membrane
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: Extracellular SNAP–ephrin-A5 was blocked by SNAP surface block (gray), before the cell-permeant SNAP cell fluorescein was applied to the living cells (green). After washing, axons were allowed to grow for another 20–22 hr. Then, anti-fluorescein antibody was added to the living cells for 15 min, washed out and, subsequently, explants were fixed and stained for anti-fluorescein (magenta stars). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.021
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques: Blocking Assay, Staining
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) eGFP–Rab11 localization in a transfected RGC axon (outline drawn in the actin channel indicated as white, dotted line). Rab11-positive vesicular structures are predominantly observed in the axon shaft and the central domain of GCs and, to a lesser extent, are found to stretch into the more distal GC. ( B–B'' ) Representative images of an eGFP–Rab11 ( B ) and a SNAP–ephrin-A5 ( B' ) co-transfected GC on laminin substrate. Vesicular structures identified by automated image segmentation are indicated in green and red for each channel, respectively. ( B'' ) Colocalization of SNAP–ephrin-A5 and eGFP–Rab11 within the Rab11-positive vesicles is shown as yellow areas. ( C–C'' ) Example images of an eGFP–Rab11- ( C ) and a SNAP–ephrin-A5-transfected GC ( C' ) growing on ephrin-A5-Fc. ( C'' ) Colocalization of SNAP–ephrin-A5 and eGFP–Rab11 within the Rab11-positive vesicles (yellow areas) increases upon desensitization. ( D ) Manders' colocalization coefficient (MCC) as a measure of colocalization of SNAP–ephrin-A5 and eGFP–Rab11 within the Rab11-positive vesicles in naïve (on laminin: M2 = 0.55) and adapted (on ephrin-A5: M2 = 0.72) GCs, respectively. N: number of independent experiments, number of analyzed GCs in brackets; error bars indicate standard deviations. T-test with *: α <0.05. Scale: 10 μm. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.022 10.7554/eLife.25533.023 Figure 8—source data 1. Original data underlying the bar chart of . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.023
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques: Transfection
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Ephrin-A5-Fc and ( B ) EphA3-Fc collapse assays. In accordance with MβCD experiments, Sphingomyelinase (SMase, 400mU/ml)-treated GCs show reduced collapse rates when exposed to soluble ephrin-A5-Fc (0.25 μg/ml) or EphA3-Fc (15 μg/ml) compared to controls without SMase. ( A ) Fc (0.25 μg/ml), 19.5%; Fc+SMase, 27.5%; eA5, 79.6%; and eA5+SMase, 50% collapsed. ( B ) Fc (4.2 μg/ml), 22.5%; Fc+SMase, 27.7%; EA3, 52.9%; and EA3+SMase, 23.8% collapsed after 20 min incubation. SMase was applied during a 30 min pre-incubation and thereafter together with Fc or ephrin-A5. N: number of independent experiments, number of analyzed GCs in brackets; error bars show standard deviations. T-test with n.s.: α ≥ 0.05, *: α < 0.05, **: α < 0.01, ***: α < 0.001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.026 10.7554/eLife.25533.027 Figure 9—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data underlying the bar charts of . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.027
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques: Incubation
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Ephrin-A5-Fc and ( B ) EphA3-Fc collapse assays. Methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (MβCD, 2 mg/ml)-treated GCs show enhanced desensitization (reduced collapse rates) when exposed to soluble ephrin-A5-Fc (0.25 μg/ml) or EphA3-Fc (15 μg/ml) compared to controls without MβCD. ( A ) GCs collapsed after 20 min incubation: Fc (0.25 μg/ml),16.7%; Fc+MβCD, 11.4%; eA5, 80.3%; and eA5+MβCD, 77.4%. GCs collapsed after after 60 min incubation: Fc, 12.1%; Fc+MβCD, 13.4%; eA5, 74.2%; and eA5+MβCD, 45.0%. ( B ) GCs collapsed after 20 min incubation: Fc (4.2 μg/ml), 22.8%; Fc+MβCD, 24.4%; EA3, 78.2%; and EA3+MβCD, 51.6%. GCs collapsed after 60 min incubation: Fc, 14.9%; Fc+MβCD, 10.4%; EA3, 28.3%; and EA3+MβCD, 14.5%. N: number of independent experiments, number of analyzed GCs in brackets; error bars show standard deviations. T-test with n.s.: α ≥0.05, *: α <0.05, ***: α <0.001. ( C ) EA3–eA5 and ( D ) eA5–EA3 double-cue gap assays. After 115 µm wide gaps, untreated GCs predominantly stop, whereas MβCD-treated GCs ( C', D' ) ignore the protein field after the gap. ( E ) Quantification of double-cue gap assays: EA3–eA5, 80.7%; EA3–eA5+MβCD, 46.3% stopping; eA5–EA3, 70.9%; and eA5–EA3+MβCD, 23.6% stopping. N: number of independent experiments, error bars show standard deviations, T-test with *: α <0.05, ***: α <0.001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.024 10.7554/eLife.25533.025 Figure 9—source data 1. Original data underlying the bar charts in . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.025
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques: Incubation
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: Co-adaptation enables fiber terminals to enter a tectal target field initially and allows correct mapping therein (gray circles), whereas non-adapted terminals (white circles) fail to enter a tectal target field in simulations with 200 GCs placed in front of the target. The graded distributions of EphAs (blue) and ephrin-As (red) on the target field are symbolized by the colored wedges. R F and L F of adapted terminals are initially deflected by a factor of 30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.028
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques:
Journal: eLife
Article Title: Ephrin-A/EphA specific co-adaptation as a novel mechanism in topographic axon guidance
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25533
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) EphAs (blue) and ephrin-As (red), located in membrane lipid microdomains (dark gray), signal in trans due to external cues. Trans forward (FWD) and reverse (REV) signals integrate into the guidance potential, D , and elicit repulsion when not balanced. Trans signaling also promotes sphingomyelin (SM) synthesis, and when incorporated into the membrane, this phospholipid might proportionally solubilize EphAs and ephrin-As from their respective domains. ( B ) Dispersed, unbound sensors are destined for constitutive clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) and might increase cis signaling upon internalization, as anti-parallel orientation is favored in high-curvature membrane vesicles. Enhanced cis signals desensitize GCs to trans signals. Sensitivity returns with the recycling of unbound sensors, and degraded receptor/ligand complexes should constitutively be replaced through protein synthesis in the long run. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25533.029
Article Snippet: The medium on explant cultures was replaced with warm F12-MC containing recombinant
Techniques: Membrane
Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology
Article Title: Structurally encoded intraclass differences in EphA clusters drive distinct cell responses
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2617
Figure Lengend Snippet: a) Schematic overview showing Eph domain composition: ligand-binding domain (LBD), sushi, epidermal-growth-factor-like (EGF), fibronectin type III (FN1 and FN2), transmembrane helix (TM), tyrosine kinase and sterile-alpha motif (SAM). Domains are coloured separately for the ectodomain. b) Rounding responses of non-transfected control and Eph-transfected HeLa cells upon ephrinA5-Fc stimulation were measured. Average adherent cell surface areas were normalized using the values at time =0 (before receptor stimulation). Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test and is shown with red stars (control, EphA4) and black stars (EphA2, EphA4). Error bars denote s.e.m. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. c) Hela cell stripe assay. Adhesion of Eph-transfected cells to ephrinA5-Fc coated surfaces is shown (50% corresponds to random distribution, > 50% reflects adhesion). Statistical significance was calculated with one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test and is shown with red stars (to EphA4), blue stars (to EphA2) and grey stars (to control). Error bars denote s.e.m. ** P < 0.01.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Ligand Binding Assay, Transfection, Stripping Membranes
Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology
Article Title: Structurally encoded intraclass differences in EphA clusters drive distinct cell responses
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2617
Figure Lengend Snippet:
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Methylation
Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology
Article Title: Structurally encoded intraclass differences in EphA clusters drive distinct cell responses
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2617
Figure Lengend Snippet: a) Cartoon diagrams are shown of complete EphA4 ectodomain (EphA4 ecto ), unliganded or in complex with ephrinA5 or ephrinB3 receptor-binding domain (RBD). EphA2 domains are coloured separately as indicated. Ligand-binding domain (LBD), epidermal-growth-factor-like (EGF), fibronectin type III domains 1 and 2 (FN1 and FN2). Ephrins are coloured in grey. b) Crystal lattice assemblies that are compatible with clustering of receptors on the same cell (in cis ) are shown as surface representations for the four crystal structures presented (side and top views). Colours are as in panel a.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Binding Assay, Ligand Binding Assay
Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology
Article Title: Structurally encoded intraclass differences in EphA clusters drive distinct cell responses
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2617
Figure Lengend Snippet: a) Schematic representation of transmembrane Eph constructs: EphA2 blue, EphA4 red. Chimeric proteins were engineered by swapping ectodomains (A2A4 or A4A2). Stars mark point mutants in the HI-loop, sushi dimerization and major ephrin-binding sites. All constructs contain an N-terminal Flag tag and a C-terminal mVenus or mCherry tag. b) HeLa cell rounding responses measured 10 minutes after ephrinA5-Fc stimulation. Plotted are averaged ratios of the adherent cell surface after and before stimulation. Statistical significance to EphA2 and EphA4 samples (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test) is shown with blue and red stars, respectively. A two-tailed T-test was used to calculate significance between A2A4 and A4A2. Error bars denote s.e.m. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, **** P < 0.0001. c) Confocal time lapse images. Eph clustering was induced by ephrinA5-Fc stimulation in COS7 cells. d) Single molecule experiments were performed using localization microscopy. Normalized Ripley’s L functions (L(r)-r)) are plotted over the distances (r(nm)) between the molecules. Increased (L(r)-r)) at particular distances reflect the amount of clustering and the cluster sizes. e) Further quantification of data presented in panel d. The percentage of detected molecules present in clusters is shown. Clusters were defined as molecules having at least 20 neighbouring molecules within a radius of 50 nm . f) Cell rounding in response to pre-clustered ephrinA5-Fc and cell adhesion to ephrinA5-Fc containing stripes was measured using transfected HeLa cells. EphA2 blue, EphA4 red, EphA2 su grey. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. Error bars denote s.e.m. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Construct, Binding Assay, FLAG-tag, Two Tailed Test, Microscopy, Transfection